结论
在本章，我们探讨了我们所遇到的一些难题。我们为导师提供的发展项目强调教学的整合性，同时也满足了一所大型研究型高校的绩效要求。我们探讨了鼓励导师采用反思性方法指导研究生的过程中所遇到的一些挑战。我们将这些难题置于反思性空间的情境中，反思性空间现在已经是博士生教育领域的重要特征。我们展示出如何在不同的博士生教育话语中开辟路径，在导师必须完成课程的强制要求下，我们如何秉持指导专业主义的理念，如何促使导师对指导的性质建立起理论化、精细化的认识，让他们知晓自己在博士生教育中需适应学生不同要求的角色。
我们也希望导师对指导教学法的认识，接下来能更广泛地激发有关博士生教育的讨论。它应在院系层面引发更细腻深入的思考，接着学校层面也能出现相应的变化。鼓励学生反思自己的经历、反思对指导的理解也能培养他们对博士生教育中存在的问题进行批判性思考。最终，希望所有这些能够激发对政策的讨论，甚至是政府层面的政策讨论。
参考文献
[1] Behnia, M. (2006) Analysis of Student Research Experience Questionnaire (SREQ): Areas of Best Practice and Suggested Improvements, Sydney, NSW: Office of the Dean of Graduate Studies, University of Sydney.
[2] Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (eds) (1985) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London: Kogan Page.
[3] Bourdieu, P. (1988) Homo Academicus, translated from the French by P. Collier, Cambridge: Polity Press.
[4] Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
[5] Brew, A. (2001) Conceptions of research: a phenomenographic study, Studies in Higher Education, 26(2): 271-285.
[6] Brew, A. and Peseta, T. (2004) Changing supervision practice: a program to encourage learning through feedback and reflection. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41 (1): 5-22.
[7] Brew, A. and Peseta, T. (2007) Report on Research Higher Degree Supervision Development Program, prepared for University of Sydney Research and Research Training Committee of Academic Board, at:http://www.usyd.edu.au/ab/commit tees/rrtc/agendas/Research_Higher_Degree_Supervision_Program.pdf.
[8] Connell, R. (1985) How to supervise a Ph.D., Vestes, 28(2): 38-42.(https://www.daowen.com)
[9] Department of Education, Science and Training (2004) Backing Australia’s Ability: Building our Future through Science and Innovation, Canberra, ACT: DEST.
[10] Green, B. and Lee A. (1995) Theorising postgraduate pedagogy, Australian Universities’ Review, 38(2): 40-45.
[11] Johnson, L., Lee, A. and Green, B. (2000) The Ph.D. and the autonomous self: gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy, Studies in Higher Education, 25(2): 135-147.
[12] Kandlbinder, P. and Peseta, T. (2001) In Supervisors’ Words: An Insider’s View of Postgraduate Supervision, Sydney, NSW: Institute for Teaching and Learning, University of Sydney, at: http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/supervision/casestudies/ book.pdf.
[13] Kyvik, S. and Smeby, J. C. (1994) Teaching and research: the relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance, Higher Education, 28(2): 227-239.
[14] Pearson, M. and Brew, A. (2002) Research training and supervision development, Studies in Higher Education, 27(1): 135-150.
[15] Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education, Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
[16] Rowland, S. (2000) The Enquiring University Teacher, Buckingham: Open University Press and Society for Research in Higher Education.
[17] Schirato, T. and Webb, J. (2003). Bourdieu’s concept of reflexivity as metaliteracy, Cultural Studies, 17(3/4): 539-552.
[18] University of Sydney (2004) Postgraduate research higher degree training at the University of Sydney, Academic Board Policy, at: http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/ab/ policies/PG_Rsch_Hghr_Dgree_Train_Sprvsn.pdf.