Lesson Six Disciplines of the Learning Organizatio...
On a cold，clear morning in December 1903，at Kitty Hawk，North Carolina，the fragile aircraft of Wilbur and Orville Wright proved that powered flight was possible.Thus was the airplane invented;but it would take more than thirty years before commercial aviation could serve the general public.
Engineers say that a new idea has been“invented”when it is proven to work in the laboratory.The idea becomes an“innovation”only when it can be replicated reliably on a meaningful scale at practical costs.If the idea is sufficiently important，such as the telephone，the digital computer，or commercial aircraft，it is called a“basic innovation”，and it creates a new industry or transforms an existing industry.In these terms，learning organizations have been invented，but they have not yet been innovated.
In engineering，when an idea moves from an invention to an innovation，diverse“component technologies”come together.Emerging from isolated developments in separate fields of research，these components gradually form an“ensemble of technologies that are critical to each others'success.Until this ensemble forms，the idea，though possible in the laboratory，does not achieve its potential in practice.”
The Wright Brothers proved that powered flight was possible，but the McDonnell Douglas DC-3，introduced in 1935，ushered in the era of commercial air travel.The DC-3 was the first plane that supported itself economically as well as aerodynamically.During those intervening thirty years(a typical time period for incubating basic innovations)，myriad experiments with commercial flight had failed.Like early experiments with learning organizations，the early planes were not reliable and cost effective on an appropriate scale.
The DC-3，for the first time，brought together five critical component technologies that formed a successful ensemble.They were:the variable-pitch propeller，retractable landing gear，a type of lightweight molded body construction called“monocque”，radial aircooled engine，and wing flaps.To succeed，the DC-3 needed all five;four were not enough.One year earlier，the Boeing 247 was introduced with all of them except wing flaps.Lacking wing flaps，Boeing's engineers found that the plane was unstable on takeoff and landing and had to downsize the engine.
Today，I believe，five new“component technologies”are gradually converging to innovate learning organizations.Though developed separately，each will，I believe，prove critical to the others'success，just as occurs with any ensemble.Each provides a vital dimension in building organizations that can truly“learn”，that can continually enhance their capacity to realize their highest aspirations:
Systems Thinking．A cloud masses，the sky darkens，leaves twist upward，and we know that it will rain.We also know that after the storm，the runoff will feed into ground water miles away，and the sky will grow clear by tomorrow.All these events are distant in time and space，and yet they are all connected within the same pattern.Each has an influence on the rest，an influence that is usually hidden from view.You can only understand the system of a rainstorm by contemplating the whole，not any individual part of the pattern.
Business and other human endeavors are also systems.They，too，are bound by invisible fabrics of interrelated actions，which often take years to fully play out their effects on each other.Since we are part of that lacework ourselves，it's doubly hard to see the whole pattern of change.Instead，we tend to focus on snapshots of isolated parts of the system，and wonder why our deepest problems never seem to get solved.Systems thinking is a conceptual framework，a body of knowledge and tools that has been developed over the past fifty years，to make the full patterns clearer，and to help us see how to change them effectively.
Though the tools are new，the underlying worldview is extremely intuitive;experiments with young children show that they learn systems thinking very quickly.
Personal Mastery．Mastery might suggest gaining dominance over people or things.But mastery can also mean a special level of proficiency.A master craftsman doesn't dominate pottery or weaving.People with a high level of personal mastery are able to consistently realize the results that matter most deeply to them—in effect，they approach their life as an artist would approach a work of art.They do that by becoming committed to their own lifelong learning.
Personal mastery is the discipline of continually clarifying and deepening our personal vision，of focusing our energies，of developing patience，and of seeing reality objectively.As such，it is an essential cornerstone of the learning organization—the learning organization's spiritual foundation.An organization's commitment to and capacity for learning can be no greater than that of its members.The roots of this discipline lie in both Eastern and Western spiritual traditions，and in secular traditions as well.
But surprisingly few organizations encourage the growth of their people in this manner.This results in vast untapped resources:“People enter business as bright，well-educated，high-energy people，full of energy and desire to make a difference，”says Hanover's O'Brien.“By the time they are 30，a few are on the‘fast track’and the rest‘put in their time’to do what matters to them on the weekend.They lose the commitment，the sense of mission，and the excitement with which they started their careers.We get damn little of their energy and almost none of their spirit.”
And surprisingly few adults work to rigorously develop their own personal mastery.When you ask most adults what they want from their lives，they often talk first about what they'd like to get rid of:“I'd like my mother-in-law to move out，”they say，or“I'd like my back problems to clear up.”The discipline of personal mastery，by contrast，starts with clarifying the things that really matter to us，of living our lives in the service of our highest aspirations.
Here，I am most interested in the connections between personal learning and organizational learning，in the reciprocal commitments between individual and organization，and in the special spirit of an enterprise made up of learners.(https://www.daowen.com)
Mental Models．“Mental models”are deeply ingrained assumptions，generalizations，or even pictures or images that influence how we understand the world and how we take action.Very often，we are not consciously aware of our mental models or the effects they have on our behavior.For example，we may notice that a co-worker dresses elegantly，and say to ourselves，“She's a country club person.”About someone who dresses shabbily，we may feel，“He doesn't care about what others think.”Mental models of what can or cannot be done in different management settings are no less deeply entrenched.Many insights into new markets or outmoded organizational practices fail to get put into practice because they conflict with powerful，tacit mental models.
Royal Dutch/Shell，one of the first large organizations to understand the advantages of accelerating organizational learning came to this realization when they discovered how pervasive was the influence of hidden mental models，especially those that become widely shared.Shell's extraordinary success in managing through the dramatic changes and unpredictability of the world oil business in the 1970s and 1980s came in large measure from learning how to surface and challenge manager's mental models.(In the early 1970s Shell was the weakest of the big seven oil companies;by the late 1980s it was the strongest.)Arie de Geus，Shell's recently retired Coordinator of Group Planning，says that continuous adaptation and growth in a changing business environment depends on“institutional learning，which is the process whereby management teams change their shared mental models of the company，their markets，and their competitors.For this reason，we think of planning as learning and of corporate planning as institutional learning.”
The discipline of working with mental models starts with turning the mirror inward;learning to unearth our internal pictures of the world，to bring them to the surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny.It also includes the ability to carry on“learningful”conversations that balance inquiry and advocacy，where people expose their own thinking effectively and make that thinking open to the influence of others.
Building Shared Vision．If any one idea about leadership has inspired organizations for thousands of years，it's the capacity to hold a shared picture of the future we seek to create.One is hard pressed to think of any organization that has sustained some measure of greatness in the absence of goals，values，and missions that become deeply shared throughout the organization.IBM had“service”;Polaroid had instant photography;Ford had public transportation for the masses and Apple had computing power for the masses.Though radically different in content and kind，all these organizations managed to bind people together around a common identity and sense of destiny.
When there is a genuine vision(as opposed to the all-toofamiliar“vision statement”)，people excel and learn，not because they are told to，but because they want to.But many leaders have personal visions that never get translated into shared visions that galvanize an organization.All too often，a company's shared vision has revolved around the charisma of a leader，or around a crisis that galvanizes everyone temporarily.But，given a choice，most people opt for pursuing a lofty goal，not only in times of crisis but at all times.What has been lacking is a discipline for translating individual vision into shared vision—not a“cookbook”but a set of principles and guiding practices.
The practice of shared vision involves the skills of unearthing shared“pictures of the future”that foster genuine commitment and enrollment rather than compliance.In mastering this discipline，leaders learn the counter-productiveness of trying to dictate a vision，no matter how heartfelt.
Team Learning．How can a team of committed managers with individual IQs above 120 have a collective IQ of 63?The discipline of team learning confronts this paradox.We know that teams can learn;in sports，in the performing arts，in science，and even，occasionally，in business，there are striking examples where the intelligence of the team exceeds the intelligence of the individuals in the team，and where teams develop extraordinary capacities for coordinated action.When teams are truly learning，not only are they producing extraordinary results but the individual members are growing more rapidly than could have occurred otherwise.
The discipline of team learning starts with“dialogue”，the capacity of members of a team to suspend assumptions and enter into a genuine“thinking together”.To the Greeks dia-logos meant a free-flowing of meaning through a group，allowing the group to discover insights not attainable individually.Interestingly，the practice of dialogue has been preserved in many“primitive”cultures，such as that of the American Indian，but it has been almost completely lost to modern society.Today，the principles and practices of dialogue are being rediscovered and put into a contemporary context.(Dialogue differs from the more common“discussion”，which has its roots with“percussion”and“concussion”，literally a heaving of ideas back and forth in a winner-takes-all competition.)
The discipline of dialogue also involves learning how to recognize the patterns of interaction in teams that undermine learning.The patterns of defensiveness are often deeply engrained in how a team operates.If unrecognized，they undermine learning.If recognized and surfaced creatively，they can actually accelerate learning.
Team learning is vital because teams，not individuals，are the fundamental learning unit in modern organizations.This where“the rubber meets the road”;unless teams can learn，the organization cannot learn.
If a learning organization were an engineering innovation，such as the airplane or the personal computer，the components would be called“technologies”.For an innovation in human behavior，the components need to be seen as disciplines.By“discipline”，Ido not mean an“enforced order”or“means of punishment”，but a body of theory and technique that must be studied and mastered to be put into practice.A discipline is a developmental path for acquiring certain skills or competencies.As with any discipline，from playing the piano to electrical engineering，some people have an innate“gift”，but anyone can develop proficiency through practice.
To practice a discipline is to be a lifelong learner.You“never arrive”;you spend your life mastering disciplines.You can never say，“We are a learning organization，”any more than you can say，“I am an enlightened person.”The more you learn，the more acutely aware you become of your ignorance.Thus，a corporation cannot be“excellent”in the sense of having arrived at a permanent excellence;it is always in the state of practicing the disciplines of learning，of becoming better or worse.
That organizations can benefit from disciplines is not a totally new idea.After all，management disciplines such as accounting have been around for a long time.But the five learning disciplines differ from more familiar management disciplines in that they are“personal”disciplines.Each has to do with how we think，what we truly want，and how we interact and learn with one another.In this sense，they are more like artistic disciplines than traditional management disciplines.Moreover，while accounting is good for“keeping score”，we have never approached the subtler tasks of building organizations，of enhancing their capabilities for innovation and creativity，of crafting strategy and designing policy and structure through assimilating new disciplines.Perhaps this is why，all too often，great organizations are fleeting，enjoying their moment in the sun，then passing quietly back to the ranks of the mediocre.
Practicing a discipline is different from emulating“a model”.All too often，new management innovations are described in terms of the“best practices”of so-called leading firms.While interesting，I believe such descriptions can often do more harm than good，leading to piecemeal copying and playing catch-up.I do not believe great organizations have ever been built by trying to emulate another，any more than individual greatness is achieved by trying to copy another“great person”.
When the five component technologies converged to create the DC-3 the commercial airline industry began.But the DC-3 was not the end of the process.Rather，it was the precursor of a new industry.Similarly，as the five component learning disciplines converge they will not create the learning organization but rather a new wave of experimentation and advancement.