参考文献
佩里·安德森（Perry Anderson）：《绝对主义国家的系谱》，刘北成、龚晓庄译，上海：上海人民出版社，2016年。
成伯清：《时间、叙事与想象——将历史维度带回社会学》，《江海学刊》2015年第5期。
康无为（Harold Kahn）：《读史偶得》，台北：“中研院”近代史研究所，1993年。
李孝悌：《代译序》，载史景迁著，《王氏之死：大历史背后的小人物命运》，李孝恺译，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2011年。
苗延威：《历史社会学的方法论争议》，《社会科学论丛》（台湾）2013年第1期。
史景迁著：《康熙：重构一位中国皇帝的内心世界》，温洽溢译，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2011年。
刘拥华：《何处是江南？〈叫魂〉叙事中的“江南隐喻”》，《史林》2015年第1期。
孙宇凡：《君主与化身的奥秘：从孔飞力的〈叫魂〉出发》，《社会学评论》2016年第6期。
——：《时间、因果性与社会学想象力》，《社会理论学报》2017年第1期。
魏斐德：《讲述中国历史》，梁禾译，《史林》2001年第3期。
魏斐德：《明清更替：十七世纪的危机抑或轴心突破》，《中国学术》第11辑，刘东编，北京：商务印书馆，2002年。
许田波：《战争与国家形成： 春秋战国与近代早期欧洲之比较》，徐进译，上海：上海人民出版社，2018年。
伊萨克·瑞德：《清教文化的性别形而上学：对萨勒姆审巫案的诠释性解释》，童韵评译，《社会》2015年第4期。
于连著：《新世纪对中国文化的挑战》，陈彦译，《二十一世纪双月刊》1999第52期。
于连著：《论多元文化：语言的差异——思想的资源，或如何酝酿未来的对话》，萧盈盈译，载乐黛云、李比雄、钱木森编，《跨文化对话》第29辑，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2012年。
周飞舟：《论社会学研究的历史维度——以政府行为研究为例》，《江海学刊》2016年第1期。
周雪光：《运动型治理机制：中国国家治理的制度逻辑再思考》，《开放时代》2012年第3期。
周雪光：《国家治理逻辑与中国官僚体制：一个韦伯理论视角》，《开放时代》2013年第3期。
Abbott,Andrew: “Transcending general linear reality.”Sociological Theory,1988 ,6(2).
——: “History and Sociology: The Lost Synthesis.”Social Science History ,1991,15 (02).
——: “From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism.” Sociological Methods & Research ,1992,20(4).
Abend,Gabriel:“The Meaning of ‘Theory’.”Sociological Theory ,2008,26(2).
Abrams,Philip: Historical Sociology.Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1982.
Adams,Julia,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff.ed.: “Introduction: Social Theory,Modernity,andthe Three Waves of Historical Sociology.” In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by Julia Adams,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Adams,Julia,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff: Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by Julia Adams,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Barkey,Karen: Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective.Cambridge,New York: Cambridge University Press.2008.
Clemens,Elisabeth S: “Afterword: Logics of History?Agency,Multiplicity,and Incoherence in the Explanation of Change.” In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Berger,Joseph,David Willer,and Morris Zelditch:“Theory Programs and Theoretical Problems.” Sociological Theory ,2005,23 (2).
Berger,Joseph,and Morris Zelditch: “Orienting Strategies and Theory Growth.” In Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory,edited by JosephBerger and Morris Zelditch,Stanford,California: Stanford University Press,1993.
Burke,Peter: “Review of Historical Sociology by Philip Abrams .” American Journal of Sociology ,1985,90 (4).
——: History and Social Theory.Ithaca,N.Y: Cornell University Press,1993.
——: “Comparative History and Comparative Sociology.”Serendipities: Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences ,2016,1 (1).
Calhoun,Craig: “History and Sociology in Britain.A Review Article.” Comparative Studies in Society and History ,1987,29(3).
——: “The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,edited by Terrence J.McDonald,Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ,1996.
Clemens,Elisabeth S: “Afterword: Logics of History?Agency,Multiplicity,and Incoherence in the Explanation of Change.” In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by Julia Adams,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff,Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
——: “Sociology as a Historical Science.” The American Sociologist ,2006,37 (2).
——: “Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events,Processes,and Emergence.” Annual Review of Sociology,2007 ,33 (1).
Collins,Randall: Three Sociological Traditions.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1985.
Demetriou,Chares,and Victor Roudometof: “The History of Historical-Comparative Methods in Sociology.”In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2014.
de la Roche,Senechal .“Why is Collective Violence Collective?” Sociological Theory 19,no.2 (2001).
Diamond,Sigmund: “Review of Historical Sociology by Philip Abrams.”History and Theory ,1984,23 (3).
Emirbayer,Mustafa: “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.”American Journal of Sociology ,1997,103(2).
Go,Julian: American Empire and the Politics of Meaning: Elite Political Cultures in the Philippines and Puerto Rico during U.S.Colonialism.Durham: Duke University Press Books,2008.
Goldthorpe,John H: “The Uses of History in Sociology:Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies.” British Journal of Sociology,1991.
Graff,Harvey: “The ‘Problem’ of Interdisciplinarity in Theory,Practice,and History.” Social Science History ,2016,40 (4).
Hirschman,Daniel and Isaac Ariail Reed: “Formation Stories and Causality in Sociology.” Sociological Theory ,2014,32(4).
Kiser,Edgar,and Michael Hechter: “The Role of General Theory in Comparative-Historical Sociology.”American Journal of Sociology,1991.
Kumar,Krishan: “Historical Sociology.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory,edited by Bryan S.Turner,Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2009.
——: Visions of Empire: How Five Imperial Regimes Shaped the World.Princeton,N.J.: Princeton University Press,2017.
Hamilton,Gary G: “The ‘new History’ in Sociology.”International Journal of Politics,Culture,and Society,1987 ,1 (1).
Lachmann,Richard: “Introduction to the Symposium.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology ,2006,47 (4).
Mann,Michael: The Sources of Social Power,Vol.I: A History of Power from the Beginning to 1760 AD.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1986.
Mayrl,Damon,and Nicholas Wilson.n.d.: “What Do Historical Sociologists Do All Day? Historical Method in Theory and Practice.”
McDonald,Terrence: “What We Talk about When We Talk about History: The Conversations of History and Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,edited by Terrence J.McDonald,Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1996a.
——: “Introduction.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,edited by Terrence J.McDonald,Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1996b.
Mills,Charles.W: The Sociological Imagination.Oxford: Oxford University Press,2000.
Reed,Isaac.: “Epistemology Contextualized: Social-Scientific Knowledge in a Postpositivist Era.” Sociological Theory ,2010,28 (1).
Schwartz,Mildred A: “Historical Sociology in the History of American Sociology.” Social Science History ,1987,11 (1).
Sewell,William H.Jr:“Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,edited by Terrence J.McDonald,Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1996.
——: Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation.Chicago: University of Chicago Press,2005.
——: “AHR Forum: Crooked Lines.”The American Historical Review ,2008 ,113(2).
Theda Skocpol: States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France,Russia and China.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1979.
——: “Emerging Agendas and Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology.” In Vision and Method in Historical Sociology,edited by Theda Skocpol,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1984a.
——: “Review of Historical Sociology.” by Philip Abrams.The Journal of Modern History,1985,57 (3).
Steinmetz,George: “Critical Realism and Historical Sociology: A Review Article”.Comparative Studies in Society and History ,1998 ,40(1).
——:“A Disastrous Division: Thoughts from the Border between Historical Sociology and History.” Trajectories:Newsletter of the Comparative Historical Section of the American Sociological Association ,2005a,17 (1).
——: “The Epistemological Unconscious of U.S.Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology.” In Remaking Modernity,edited by Julia Adams,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff,Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005b.
——: “The Historical Sociology of Historical Sociology.Germany and the United States in the Twentieth Century.”Sociologica Theory,2007a ,(3).
——: “Transdisciplinarity as a Nonimperial Encounter: For an Open Sociology.” Thesis Eleven ,2007b,91 (1).
——: “The Relations between Sociology and History in the United States: The Current State of Affairs.” Journal of Historical Sociology ,2007c,20 (1-2).
Steinmetz,George: The Devil’s Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao,Samoa,and Southwest Africa.Chicago: University of Chicago Press,2008.
——:“Comparative History and Its Critics.” In A Companion to Global Historical Thought,edited by Prasenjit Duara,Viren Murthy,and Andrew Sartori,John Wiley &Sons,2014a.
——: “The Sociology of Empires,Colonies,and Postcolonialism.” Annual Review of Sociology,2014b,40(1).
——: “Field Theory and Interdisciplinarity: History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century.” Comparative Studies in Society and History ,2017,59(2).
Stryker,Robin: “Beyond History Versus Theory Strategic Narrative and Sociological Explanation.” Sociological Methods & Research ,1996 ,24 (3).
Tilly,Charles: “On Historical Sociology.” In Current Perspectives in Social Theory,Volume 1.Emerald Group Publishing Limited,1980.
——: Durable Inequality.Berkeley,California: University of California Press,1998.
Wagner,David: “Theoretical Research Programs.”Edited by George Ritzer Ritzer.The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.Oxford and New York: Blackwell Publishers ,2007.
Wagner,David G.and Joseph Berger: “Do Sociological Theories Grow?” American Journal of Sociology,1985,90(4).
——: “Programs,Theory,and Metatheory.” AmericanJournal of Sociology ,1986 ,92(1).
Zelditch,Morris: “Levels of Specificity within Theoretical Strategies.” Sociological Perspectives ,1991,34(3).
Zhao,Dingxin: The Confucian-Legalist State: A New Theory of Chinese History.Oxford University Press,2015.
[1]德国、法国、英国的情况与美国不同，见Calhoun（1987）和Steinmetz（2017）。本研究对“历史社会学的自我意识”之分析没有直接涉及德法甚至英国的情况。若有涉及，只是以美国为接受者的角度，处理已然影响到该领域学者的相关学说。同时，20世纪30—40年代甚至到60年代的美国，还存在将“历史社会学”这一名词作为进化论取向的社会学研究的代名词：专门以“社会进化与进步的理论”、发现社会发展的起源与法则为研究内容的社会学。他们也抱怨当时主流社会学的“去历史化”问题（Schwartz，1987）。因此相较于以今薄古地批评，究竟如何因时制宜地安置这一时期的“历史社会学”，有待再分析，这里暂不处理。
[2]“把历史带回来”已经成为中国历史社会学者的宣言，例如成伯清（2015）和周飞舟（2016）。
[3]综述可见苗延威（2013）。
[4]“自我意识”一词来自于德梅特里和鲁多梅托夫的文章的子标题《历史社会学自我意识的诞生》（“The Birth of Historical Sociology’s Self-Consciousness”），见Demetriou and Roudometof（2014： 43-60）。
[5]“分支领域”或“分支学科”（subdiscipline）使用较为普遍，见Abbott（1991），Steinmetz（2017）不赘。“基质”来自于菲利普·艾布拉姆斯（Philip Abrams）所说“历史社会学家并不是社会学的一些特定种类，而是这个学科的基质”。“二者合一”之说，是为了兼顾社会学与历史学合二为一、且成独立的第三种单元的情况，见Abram （1982：2）。
[6]以“大国沙文主义”描述某一学科的专业特征，是借用了休厄尔对历史学学科的批评，见Sewell（2005：198）。
[7]这一词是借用了克里尚·库玛尔（Krishan Kumar）对历史社会学的批评，见Kumar（2009：391-408），下文会详述。
[8]尽管已有学者从方法论角度谈及此类内容，例如苗延威（2013）。但本章更进一步：在相关的方法论或认识论背后，架设了怎样的学科或跨学科想象？毕竟，不同的学科定位预设了不同的研究策略与研究界限，进一步强化了相应的认识论或方法论。
[9]比较法的历史分析并非历史社会学所独有，历史学中也有但发展情况有所不同，见Burke（2016）。
[10]这也与历史学家的理论意识有关，涉及历史学的理论使用现状及其潜能的分析，见Sewell（2005：ch.1）。
[11]霍尔的话语形式的秩序安排，与其说是适用于整合社会学与历史学，倒不如说是适合整个社会科学乃至人文科学。因此，只能视为通用研究程序，本身并无学科性。
[12]在英文社会学的重要刊物里，对《叫魂》一书有正式引述的情况，只见于Sociological Theory刊载过的一篇集体暴力研究。不过，这篇文章的作者却是来自历史系而非社会学系，见de la Roche（2001）。
[13]这种风格反映于他对历史书写理论总结，见魏斐德（2001）。
[14]当然，我这样的说法是排除了诸多历史学的作品，以及像迈克尔·曼（Michael Mann，1986）这样全球史视角的历史社会学家。