参考文献
杨伯峻译注：《论语译注》，北京：中华书局，1980年。
Abbott,Andrew: “A Brief Note on Pasturization.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology,2006,47(5).
Adams,Julia,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloあ,eds: Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Adams,Julia,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff:“Introduction: Social Theory,Modernity,and the ThreeWaves of Historical Sociology.” In Remaking Modernity:Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Adams,Julia,Elisabeth S.Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff :“‘Time and Tide...’: Rejoinder to Abbott,Charrad,Goldstone,Mahoney,Riley,Roy,Sewell,Wingrove and Zerilli.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology ,2006,47(5).
Biernacki,Richard:“The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Models of Conduct.”In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Brubaker,Rogers:“Ethnicity without Groups.” In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Carroll,Patrick:“Articulating Theories of States and State Formation.” Journal of Historical Sociology,2009,22(4).
Charrad,Mounira M:“Waves of Comparative and Historical Sociology.” International Journal of ComparativeSociology,2006,47(5).
Clemens,Elisabeth S:“Afterword: Logics of History?Agency,Multiplicity,and Incoherence in the Explanation of Change.” In Remaking Modernity: Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Clemens,Elisabeth S:“Toward a Historicized Sociology:Theorizing Events,Processes,and Emergence.” Annual Review of Sociology ,2007,33(1).
Gorski,Philip S:“The Matter of Emergence: Material Artifacts and Social Structure.” Qualitative Sociology,2016,39(2).
Gross,Neil:“Pragmatism and the Study of Large-Scale Social Phenomena.” Theory and Society,2018,47(1).
HedstrÖm,Peter and Richard Swedberg,eds:Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998.
Joas,Hans and Jens Beckert:“A Theory of Action:Pragmatism and the Creativity of Action.” Transactional Viewpoints ,2002,1(4).
Mahoney,James:“On the Second Wave of Historical Sociology,1970s—Present.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology,2006,47(5).
McAdam,Doug,Sidney Tarrow,and Charles Tilly:Dynamics of Contention.Cambridge? New York: Cambridge University Press,2001.
Mead,George Herbert: The Philosophy of the Present.edited by A.E.Murphy.LaSalle,Ill.: Open Court,1932.
Reed,Isaac Ariail:“Power: Relational,Discursive,and Performative Dimensions.” Sociological Theory ,2013,31(3).
Riley,Dylan:“Waves of Historical Sociology.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology ,2006,47(5).
Roy,William G:“Review of Remaking Modernity:Politics,History,and Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology ,2006,112(1).
Sewell,William H.Jr :“Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences,edited by T.J.McDonald.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1996.
Sewell,William H.,Jr:“On Waves of Historical Sociology.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology,2006,47(5).
Skocpol,Theda,ed: Vision and Method in Historical Sociology.Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press,1984.
Steinmetz,George:“Critical Realism and Historical Sociology: A Review Article.” Comparative Studies inSociety and History ,1998,40(1).
Steinmetz,George :“The Epistemological Unconscious of U.S.Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Case of Historical Sociology.” In Remaking Modernity:Politics,History,and Sociology,edited by J.Adams,E.S.Clemens,and A.S.Orloff.Durham and London: Duke University Press,2005.
Stinchcombe,Arthur L : Theoretical Methods in Social History.New York: Academic Press Inc,1978.
Stinchcombe,Arthur L:“The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About Mechanisms in Social Science.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences ,1991,21(3).
Thomas,William I :“The Unadjusted Girl: With Cases and Standpoint for Behavior Analysis.” Criminal Science Monographs ,1923,(4).
Tilly,Charles :“Three Visions of History and Theory.”History and Theory ,2007,46(2).
Wagner,David :“Theoretical Research Programs” edited by G.R.Ritzer.The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology ,2007.
Wan,Poe Yu-ze : Reframing the Social: Emergentist Systemism and Social Theory.Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing,2011.
[1]查尔斯·蒂利（Charles Tilly，2007）在一份书评中，提出了存在论—认识论—方法论的三分框架，认为第三波历史社会学在认识论和方法论都是主张诠释取向，存在论上则是认为“个体人类意识是社会过程的关键性发源及其所在之处”。蒂利所说的认识论和方法论相似，可合并为方法论层次。同时，尽管蒂利限于书评文体，没有展开论述。
[2]克莱门斯（Clemens，2005： 500）也使用“制度”概念，但是更为含糊和随意，无法展开分析。本章将其视为图式的同义词，在此略过。
[3]这里值得补充论证的是：第三波历史社会学所说的突现，并不是批判实在论脉络下的术语。尽管从第三波历史社会学的成员分布来看，乔治·斯坦梅茨（George Steinmetz）和伊莎贝茨·克莱门斯（Elisabeth S.Clemens）对批判实在论（critical realism）的支持易于误导。其中斯坦梅茨正是批判实在论在美国的重要代表，而他在为《重塑现代性》撰写的美国历史社会学史的回顾一章——《美国社会学的认识论式无意识以及后福特主义的转变：以历史社会学为例》（“The Epistemological Unconscious of U.S.Sociology and the Transition to Post-Fordism： The Case of Historical Sociology”）也是批判实在论的“科普文章”，详细陈述了批判实在论与美国主流的实证主义之不同（Steinmetz，2005：109-157）。同时，该书结论一章的作者及全书编辑的克莱门斯（Clemens，2007），在2007年发表的历史社会学回顾总结作品中，更是支援斯坦梅茨（Steinmetz，1998）及其理论来源巴斯卡（Roy Bhaskar），认为历史社会学要探讨“由汇聚的诸种因果机制所共同决定的复杂事件”。
[4]斯廷奇科姆（Stinchcombe，1978： 8）使用的词汇是“主导机制”（master mechanism），其意思是休厄尔（Sewell，1996：251-254）在分析蒂利作品时使用的“主导过程”。尽管斯廷奇科姆（Stinchcombe，1991）对于机制的探讨与他的深度类比方法论之间有衔接的可能性，但是本章仍使用了“主导过程”一词。