Notes to Chapter Two
1.See Alexander N.Sack,Conflicts of Laws in the History of English Law,in LAW: A CENTURY OF PROGRESS,1835-1935 (Vol.III) 343-454 (1937).
2.JAMES FAWCETT & JANEEN M.CARRUTHERS,CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 26 (14th ed.,2008).
3.ARTHUR K.KUHN,COMPARATIVE COMMENTARIES ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 19 (1937).
4.JOSEPH STORY,COMMENTARIES ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 37 (1834).
5.F.VON SAVIGNY,SYSTEM DES HEUTIGEN ROMISCHEN RECHTS (Vol.VIII) iv (1849).
6.WOLFF,PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 34 (2nd ed.,1950).
7.William Tetley,Q.C.,A Canadian Looks at American Conflict of Law Theory and Practice,Especially in the Light of The American Legal and Social Systems,38 COL.J.TRANSNAT’L L 299 (1999).
8.See W.Cook,The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws,33 YALE L.J.457 (1924).
9.SYMEON C.SYMEONIDES,THE AMERICAN CHOICE-OF-LAW REVOLUTION: PAST,PRESENT AND FUTURE 10 (2006).
10.W.COOK,THE LOGICAL AND LEGAL BASES OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 43 (1942).
11.See B.Currie,SELECTED ESSAYS ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 338 (1963).
12.SYMEON C.SYMEONIDES,THE AMERICAN CHOICE-OF-LAW REVOLUTION: PAST,PRESENT AND FUTURE 12 (2006).
13.D.Cavers,A Critique of the Choice-of-Law Problem,47 HARV.L.REV.173,178 (1933).(https://www.daowen.com)
14.PETER NORTH & J.J FAWCETT,CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 28 (13th ed.,1999).
15.B.Currie,SELECTED ESSAYS ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 189 (1963).
16.B.Currie,The Disinterested Third State,28 LAW & CONTEMP.PROB.778 (1963).
17.See FRIEDRICH K.JUENGER,CHOICE OF LAW AND MULTISTATE JUSTICE 101 (2000).
18.See S.Symeonides,Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1997,46 AM.J.COMP.L.234 (1998).
19.William Tetley,Q.C.,A Canadian Looks at American Conflict of Laws Theory and Practice,Especially in the Light of The American Legal and Social Systems,38 COL.J.TRANSNAT’L L 305 (1999).
20.THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE,RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW SECOND CONFLICT OF LAWS SECOND,s 6 (1971).
21.J.H.C.Morris,Law and Reason Triumphant or: How not to Review a Restatement,21 AM.J.COMP.L.330 (1973).
22.See S.Symeonides,Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1997,46 AM.J.COMP.L.266 (1998).
【注释】
[1]Currie wrote:“We would be better off without choice-of-law rules.Normally,even in cases involving foreign elements,the court should be expected as a matter of course to apply the rules of decision found in the law of the forum.” See SCOLES AND HAY,CONFLICT OF LAWS 16 (2nd ed.,1992).
[2]Adopted at Washington,D.C.,May 23,1969.