Notes to Chapter One

Notes to Chapter One

1.SHI SHANGKUAN,MINFA ZONGLUN [GENERAL PART OF CIVIL LAW] 87 (2000).

2.See MARTIN WOLFF,PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 110 (2nd ed.,1950).

3.Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Minfadian [Civil Code] (2020) (PRC).

4.French Civil Code,art.725; Spanish Civil Code,art.30.

5.See ZITELMANN,TRENDS OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 90 (1971).

6.MARTIN WOLFF,PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 276 (2nd ed.,1950).

7.German Civil Code,art.20.

8.French Civil Code,art.725.

9.See GERMAN CIVIL CODE,arts.1348-1351.

10.MARTIN WOLFF,PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 277 (2nd ed.,1950).

11.See Swiss Civil Code,art.102,and the English Matrim.Causes Act (1937).

12.ALBERT A.EHRENZWEIG,TREATISE ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 247 (1962).

13.SHI SHANGKUAN,MINFA ZONGLUN [GENERAL PART OF CIVIL LAW] 88 (2000).

14.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority#Age_15,last visited on March 25,1017.

15.ERNST RABEL,THE CONFLICT OF LAWS,A COMPARATIVE STUDY,vol.1,200 (1958).

16.FRIEDRICH K.JUENGER,CHOICE OF LAW AND MULTISTATE JUSTICE 41 (2000).

17.JAMES FAWCETT & JANEEN M.CARRUTHERS,CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 154 (14th ed.,2008).

18.GUOJI SIFA [PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW] 248 (Huang Jin ed.,2004).

19.JAMES FAWCETT & JANEEN M.CARRUTHERS,CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 154 (14th ed.,2008)(https://www.daowen.com)

20.Kahn-Freund,THE GROWTH OF INTERNATIONALISM IN ENGLISH PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 155 (1960).

21.JAMES FAWCETT & JANEEN M.CARRUTHERS,CHESHIRE AND NORTH’S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 154 (14th ed.,2008).

22.Cass.(req.)(Jan.16,1861) S.1861.1.305.

23.ERNST RABEL,THE CONFLICT OF LAWS,A COMPARATIVE STUDY,vol.2,205 (1958).

24.GUOJI SIFA [PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW] 248 (Huang Jin ed.,2004).

25.Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Minfa Tongze [GPCL] art.143 (1986) (PRC).

26.Mo Zhang,International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System,25 B.C.INT’L & COMP.L.REV.83 (2002).

27.Zuigao Renmin Fayuan Guanyu Shiyong Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Minfatongze Ruogan Wenti de Yijian [Supreme People’s Court,Opinions on Application of the General Principle of Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China],92 Zuigao Renmin Fayuan Gongbao 22[Bulletin of Supreme People’s Court] arts.179-181 (1988) (PRC).

28.Ernst Rabel,THE CONFLICT OF LAWS,A COMPARATIVE STUDY,vol.1 (1958),200.

29.Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Shewai Minshi Falvguanxi Shiyongfa [Act on the Application of Laws over Foreign-related Civil Relationships] arts.11,12,13,15 (2010).

30.Id.,at art.20.

31.Id.,at art.12(2).

32.ERNST RABEL,THE CONFLICT OF LAWS,A COMPARATIVE STUDY,vol.2,72-73 (1958).

33.MARTIN WOLFF,PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 294 (2nd ed.,1950).

【注释】

[1]Chinese law is silent on this issue; however,given China is a civil law country,the author submits that China should follow the civil law approach.

[2]The system of declaration of death prevails in Germany and Austria; the system of declaration of absence in France,Japan,Belgium,the Netherlands,Spain,Portugal,and Switzerland; China establishes both systems.

[3]Domicile requires three factors: capacity,residence,and intention,for the detailed discussion on the difference between domicile and residence.