质量和标准的监督
The University employs several mechanisms for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of teaching，learning and assessment，including:
学校采用多种机制评估和改善教、学及评价的质量和标准，包括：
· Annual Course/Programme Appraisals are prepared for each course and reviewed and approved by Course/Programme Management Teams and School Academic Boards which consider，amongst other things，feedback generated from student questionnaires；
对每个专业，每年都会进行年度专业评估，经专业管理团队及学院学术委员会审核及批准。在诸要素之中，他们还会考虑学生调查问卷所反馈出来的信息；
· Institution-Led Subject Review，involving external panel members，on a six-yearly basis to formally review its major subject provision，followed by at three year interim review to monitor progress against actions/issues raised through the review process；
由机构主导、外部委员会成员参与的学科评估，每六年进行一次，对学科教学的主要内容做正式审查，然后于第三年进行中期审查，以监督在审查过程中提出的行动或问题整改的进展；
· External Examiner Annual Reports；
外部审查员年度报告；
· Ongoing liaison with industrial/professional liaison groups.
与业界或专业联络小组持续保持联络沟通。
Formal Committees with responsibility for monitoring and evaluating quality and standards:
负责监督和评估教学质量和标准的正式委员会：
· Staff/Student Liaison Committees，or equivalent；(https://www.daowen.com)
教职工/学生联络委员会或同等机构；
· Course/Programme Management Teams；
专业管理团队；
· School Academic Boards；
学院学术委员会；
· Assessment Boards；
考核委员会；
· Quality Assurance and Enhancement Committee and associated Sub-Committees.
质量保证和提升委员会及相关下设分支委员会。
In addition to the University mechanisms listed，it should be noted that the majority of faculty teaching core accounting modules are members of professional accounting bodies which have requirements for compulsory continuing professional development.This ensures that members are kept up to date with current developments，emerging issues and best practice.
除了上述学校层面的机制外，应注意的是，大部分教授会计专业核心课程的教师都是专业会计团体的成员，而这些专业团体对成员的继续教育专业发展有强制性要求。这也保证了各成员与时俱进地了解当前的发展、前沿问题和最佳做法。
FEEDBACK FROM STUDENTS