参考文献
［1］Agarwal, A. & A. Lavie. 2008. Meteor, m-bleu and m-ter: evaluation metrics for high-correlation with human rankings of machine translation output [A]. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 115-118.
［2］Anderson, P., Fernando, B., Johnson, M., et al. 2016. Spice: Semantic propositional image caption evaluation [A]. European Conference on Computer Vision [C]. Basel: Springer International Publishing. 382-398.
［3］Ariel, M. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview [J]. Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 8: 29-87.
［4］Artstein, R. & M. Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics [J]. Computational Linguistics, 34(4): 555-596.
［5］Avramidis, E., Burchardt, A, Hunsicker S, et al. 2014. The taraX? corpus of human-annotated machine translations [A]. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference [C]. The European Language Resources Association. 2679-2682.
［6］Baker, M. 1992. A Coursebook on Translation [M]. London: Routledge.
［7］Banarescu, L., Bonial, C., Cai, S., et al. 2012. Abstract meaning representation(AMR) 1.0 specification. In parsing on freebase from question-answer Pairs [A]. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1533-1544.
［8］Banarescu, L., Bonial, C., Cai, S., et al. 2013. Abstract meaning representation for sembanking [A]. Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 178-186.
［9］Banarescu, L., Bonial, C., Cai, S., et al. 2014. Abstract meaning representation(AMR) 1.2 specification. In parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs [A]. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistic. 1533-1544.
［10］Banerjee, S. & A. Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments [A]. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 65-72.
［11］Barzilay, R. & M. Elhadad. 1999. Using lexical chains for text summarization [A]. In I. Mani & M. T. Maybury (Eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization[C]. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 111-121.
［12］Basak, D., Pal S. & D. C. Patranabis. 2007. Support vector regression [J]. Neural Information Processing Letters and Reviews, 11(10): 203-224.
［13］Bergsma, S. & D. Lin. 2006. Bootstrapping path-based pronoun resolution [A]. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistic. 33-40.
［14］Bernardi, R., Cakici, R., Elliott, D., et al. 2016. Automatic description generation from images: A Survey of models, datasets, and evaluation measures [J]. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 55: 409-442.
［15］Bloodgood, M. & C. Callison-Burch. 2010. Using Mechanical Turk to build machine translation evaluation sets [A]. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 208-211.
［16］Bojar, O., Buck, C., Federmann, C., et al. 2014. Findings of the 2014 workshop on statistical machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 12-58.
［17］Bojar, O., Chatterjee R., Federmann C., et al. 2015. Findings of the 2015 workshop on statistical machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1-46.
［18］Bojar, O., Chatterjee, R., Federmann, C., et al. 2016. Findings of the 2016 conference on machine translation (wmt16) [A]. Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 131-198.
［19］Bojar, O., Rosa, R. & A. Tamchyna. 2013. Chimera–three heads for English to Czech translation [A]. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 92-98.
［20］Bos, J. 2016. Expressive power of abstract meaning representations [J]. Computational Linguistics, 42(3): 527-535.
［21］Bowker, L. & P. Bennison. 2003. Student translation archive: design, development and application [A]. In F. Zanettin, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (Eds.) Corpora in Translator Education [C]. Manchester: St Jerome. 103-117.
［22］Cai, S. & K. Knight. 2013. Smatch: an evaluation metric for semantic feature structures [A]. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 748-752.
［23］Callison-Burch, C. 2009. Fast, cheap, and creative: evaluating translation quality using Amazon's Mechanical Turk [A]. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 286-295.
［24］Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C. & J. Schroeder. 2007.(Meta-) evaluation of machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 136-158.
［25］Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., et al. 2008. Further meta-evaluation of machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 70-106.
［26］Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., et al. 2010. Findings of the 2010 joint workshop on statistical machine translation and metrics for machine translation[A]. Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics MATR [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 17-53.
［27］Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., et al. 2011. Findings of the 2011 workshop on statistical machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 22-64.
［28］Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., et al. 2012. Findings of the 2012 workshop on statistical machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 10-51.
［29］Carlson, L., Marcu, D. & M. Ellen. 2001. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory [A]. Proceedings of Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. W01-1605.
［30］Castagnoli, S., Ciobanu, D., Kunz, K., et al. 2011. Designing a learner translator corpus for training purposes [A]. Proceedings of TALC 2006 [C]. 221-248.
［31］Cettolo, M., Niehues, J., Stüker, S., et al. 2015. The IWSLT 2015 evaluation campaign [A]. Proceedings of IWSLT [C]. Da Nang, Vietnam.
［32］Chang, Y. C., Chang, J. S., Chen, H. J. & H. C. Liou. 2008. An automatic collocation writing assistant for Taiwanese EFL learners: A case of corpus-based NLP technology [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3): 283-299.
［33］Chang, B., Danielsson, P. & W. Teubert. 2005. Chinese-English translation database: Extracting units of translation from parallel texts [A]. In G. Barnbrook, et al. (Eds.), Meaningful Texts [C]. London: Continuum. 131-140.
［34］Charniak, E. 2001. Immediate-head parsing for language models [A]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 124-131.
［35］Chen, B. & R. Kuhn. 2011. Amber: A modified bleu, enhanced ranking metric[A]. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 71-77.
［36］Choi, F. Y. Y. 2000. Advances in domain independent linear text segmentation[A]. Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 26-33.
［37］Choi, F. Y. Y., Wiemer-Hastings, P. & J. Moore. 2001. Latent semantic analysis for text segmentation [A]. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. W01-0514.
［38］Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
［39］Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 37-46.
［40］Cohen, J. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4): 213.
［41］Corder, S. P. 1974. Error analysis. In J. L. P. Allen & S. P. Corder (Eds.), Techniques in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
［42］Dagan, I., Glickman, O. & B. Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge [A]. Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment [C]. 1-15.
［43］Dahlmeier, D., Hwee, T. N. & M. W. Siew. 2013. Building a large annotated corpus of learner English: The NUS corpus of learner English [A]. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2013) [C]. NAACL/HLT. 22-31.
［44］Deane, P. 2005. A nonparametric method for extraction of candidate phrasal terms[A]. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 605-613.
［45］Denkowski, M. & A. Lavie. 2010. Extending the METEOR machine translation evaluation metric to the phrase level [A]. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 250-253.
［46］Denkowski, M. & A. Lavie. 2014. Meteor universal: language specific translation evaluation for any target language [A]. Proceedings of the EACL 2014 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. W14-3348.
［47］Doddington, G. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics [A]. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Language Technology Research [C]. Brulingtong: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. 138-145.
［48］Dreyer, M. & D. Marcu. 2012. Hyter: meaning-equivalent semantics for translation evaluation [A]. Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 162-171.
［49］Duh, K. 2008. Ranking vs. regression in machine translation evaluation [A]. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 191-194.
［50］Dunning, T. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence[J]. Computational Linguistics, 19(1): 61-74.
［51］Fishel, M., Bojar, O. & M. Popovi . 2012. Terra: a collection of translation error-annotated corpora [A]. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference [C]. The European Language Resources Association. 7-14.
［52］Florén, C. 2006. ENTRAD, an English Spanish parallel corpus created for the teaching of translation [A]. The 7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference[C]. TALC. 431-442.
［53］Fort, K., Adda, G. & K. B. Cohen. 2011. Amazon mechanical turk: Gold mine or coal mine? [J]. Computational Linguistics, 37(2): 413-420.
［54］Gimenéz, J. & L. Màrquez. 2010. Asiya: an open toolkit for automatic machine translation (meta-) evaluation [J]. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 94: 77-86.
［55］Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse [J]. Language, 69: 274-307.
［56］Gupta, R., Orasan, C. & J. V. Genabith. 2015. Machine translation evaluation using recurrent neural networks [A]. Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 380-384.
［57］Guzmán, F., Joty, S., Màrquez, L. & P. Nakov. 2015. Pairwise neural machine translation evaluation [A]. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 805-814.
［58］Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 2008. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
［59］Han, A. L. F., Lu, Y., Wong, D. F., et al. 2013. Quality estimation for machine translation using the joint method of evaluation criteria and statistical modeling[A]. Proceedings of the ACL 2013 Eight Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (ACL-WMT 2013) [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 365-372.
［60］He, H., Kevin, G. & L. Jimmy. 2015. Multi-perspective sentence similarity modeling with convolutional neural networks [A]. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1576-1586.
［61］He, Y., Du, J., Way, A. & J. van Genabith. 2010. The DCU dependency-based metric in WMT Metrics MATR 2010 [A]. Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics MATR [C]. 324-328.
［62］Hearst, M. A. 1997. TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages [J]. Computational Linguistics, 23(1): 33-64.
［63］Hobbs, J. R. 1978. Resolving pronoun references [J]. Lingua, 44(4): 311-338.
［64］Hochreiter, S. & J. Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory [J]. Neural Computation, 9(8): 1735-1780.
［65］Itagaki, M., Aikawa, T. & X. D. He. 2007. Automatic validation of terminology translation consistency with statistical method [A]. Proceedings of MT Summit XI[C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 269-274.
［66］Jones, K. S., Walker, S. & S. E. Robertson. 2000. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments: Part 2 [J]. Information Processing & Management, 36(6): 809-840.
［67］Kondo, F. 2007. Translation units in Japanese-English corpora: the case of frequent nouns [A]. Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2007) [C]. CLARIN ERIC. 1-15.
［68］Kondo-Brown, K. 2002. A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance [J]. Language Testing, 19(1): 3-31.
［69］Koponen, M. & L. Salmi. 2015. On the correctness of machine translation: A machine translation post-editing task [J]. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 23: 118-136.
［70］Kusner, M., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N., et al. 2015. From word embeddings to document distances [A]. International Conference on Machine Learning [C]. International Machine Learning Society. 957-966.
［71］Kuznetsova, P., Ordonez, V., Berg, A. C., et al. 2012. Collective generation of natural image descriptions [A]. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 359-368.
［72］Landis, J. R. & G. G. Koch. 1977. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers [J]. Biometrics, 33(2): 363-374.
［73］Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., et al. 2010. Automated grammatical error detection for language learners [J]. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 3(1): 1-134.
［74］Leacock, C., Gamon, M. & C. Brockett. 2009. User input and interactions on Microsoft Research ESL assistant [A]. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 73-81.
［75］Lee, J. & S. Seneff. 2008. Correcting misuse of verb forms [A]. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technology (ACL/HLT) [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 174-182.
［76］Liang, P., Taskar, B. & D. Klein. 2006. Alignment by agreement [A]. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL'06 [C]. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 104-111.
［77］Lin, C. & E. Hovy. 2000. The automated acquisition of topic signatures for text summarization [A]. Proceedings of COLING'00 [C]. The International Committee on Computational Linguistics. 495-501.
［78］Lin, C. Y. 2004. ROUGE: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries [A]. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (WAS 2004)[C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. W04-1013.
［79］Liu, C., Dahlmeier, D. & H. T. Ng. 2010. TESLA: Translation evaluation of sentences with linear-programming-based analysis [A]. Proceedings of the Joint Fifth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation and Metrics MATR [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 354-359.
［80］Liu, D. & D. Gildea. 2005. Syntactic features for evaluation of machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 25-32.
［81］MacCartney, B. & C. D. Manning. 2008. Modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference [A]. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 521-528.
［82］Manning, C. 2015. Computational linguistics and deep learning [J]. Computational Linguistics, 41(4): 701-707.
［83］Manning, C. & H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
［84］Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., et al. 2013a. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1301.3781.
［85］Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., et al. 2013b. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality [A]. NIPS'13 Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems [C]. Curran Associates Inc. 3111-3119.
［86］Moreau, E. & C. Vogel. 2012. Quality estimation: an experimental study using unsupervised similarity measures [A]. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics.
［87］Neubert, A. 1994. Competence in translation: a complex skill, how to study and to teach it [A]. In M. Snell-Hornby, F. Pochhacker & K. Kaindl (Eds.), Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
［88］Nießen, S., Och, F. J., Leusch, G. & H. Ney. 2000. An evaluation tool for machine translation: fast evaluation for MT research [A]. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference [C]. The European Language Resources Association. L00-1210 .
［89］Och, F. J. & N. Hermann. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models [J]. Computational Linguistics, 9(1): 19-51.
［90］Omar, N., Asma N., Razali M. & S. Darus. 2008. Automated essay marking tool for ESL writing based on heuristics [A]. Proceedings of the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI) [C]. Researchgate. 1-10.
［91］Owczarzak, K, van Genabith, J. & A. Way. 2007. Labeled dependencies in machine translation evaluation [A]. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 104-111.
［92］Padó, S., Galley, M., Jurafsky, D., et al. 2009. Robust machine translation evaluation with entailment features [A]. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th IJCNLP of the AFNLP [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 297-305.
［93］Palmer, M., Gildea, D. & P. Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: A corpus annotated with semantic roles [J]. Computational Linguistics Journal, 31(1): 71-106.
［94］Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., et al. 2002. BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on ACL [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 311-318.
［95］Pascanu, R., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K. & Y. Bengio. 2013. How to construct deep recurrent neural networks [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1312.6026.
［96］Popovi, M. & H. Ney. 2009. Syntax-oriented evaluation measures for machine translation output [A]. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 29-32.
［97］Popovi, M. & M. Arcan. 2016. PE2rr Corpus: manual error annotation of automatically pre-annotated MT post-edits [A]. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation [C]. The European Language Resources Association. 1-10.
［98］Prince, E. F. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status[A]. In C. M. William & S. A. Thompson (Eds), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 295-325.
［99］Pym, A. D. 1992. Translation error analysis and the interface with language teaching [A]. In C. Dollerup & A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 279-288.
［100］Richards, I. A. 1953. Towards a theory of translating: In studies in Chinese thought [A]. In A. F. Wright (Ed.), American Anthropological Association, Vol. 55, memoir 75. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 247-262.
［101］Salton, G. & C. Buckley. 1998. Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval [J]. Information Processing and Management, 24(5): 513-523.
［102］Savenkov, D., Pavel, B. & L. Mikhail. 2011. Search snippet evaluation at yandex: Lessons learned and future directions [A]. International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages [C]. Springer: 14-25.
［103］Shei, C. C. & H. Pain. 2000. An ESL writer's collocational aid [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2): 167-182.
［104］Sleator, D. & D. Temperley. 1993. Parsing English with a Link Grammar [A]. Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Parsing Technologies [C].
［105］Snover, M., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R., et al. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation [A]. Proceedings of Association for Machine Translation in the Americas [C]. The Association for Machine Translation. 223-231.
［106］Snover, M., Madnani, N., Dorr, B., et al. 2009a. TER-Plus: Paraphrase, semantic, and alignment enhancements to translation edit rRate [J]. Machine Translation, 23(2): 117-127.
［107］Snover, M., Madnani, N., Dorr, B. J., et al. 2009b. Fluency, adequacy, or HTER?: Exploring different human judgments with a tunable MT metric [A]. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 259-268.
［108］Sosnina, E. P. 2006. Development and application of Russian translation learner corpus [A]. Presented at Corpus Linguistics-2006 [C]. 10-14.
［109］Specia, L., Paetzold, G. & C. Scarton. 2015. Multi-level translation quality prediction with QuEst++ [A]. Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP 2015 System Demonstrations [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 115-120.
［110］Specia, L., Raj, D. & M. Turchi. 2010. Machine translation evaluation versus quality estimation [J]. Machine Translation, 24(1): 39-50.
［111］Specia, L., Shah, K., Souza J. G., et al. 2013. QuEst - A translation quality estimation framework [A]. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ACL[C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 79-84.
［112］Stymne, S. 2011. Blast: A tool for error analysis of machine translation output [A]. Proceedings of ACL-HLT'11 [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 56-61.
［113］Teubert, W. 2004. Units of meaning, parallel corpora, and their implications for language teaching [A]. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: Rododi. 171-189.
［114］Turian, P. J., Shen, L. & I. D. Melamed. 2003. Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluation [A]. Proceedings of MT Summit IX [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 386-393.
［115］Turpin, A., Tsegay, Y., Hawking, D., et al. 2007. Fast generation of result snippets in web search [A]. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval [C]. Association for Computing Machinery. 127-134.
［116］Uzar, R. & J. Waliński. 2001. Analysing the fluency of translators [J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6: 155-166.
［117］Valotkaite, J. & M. Asadullah. 2012. Error detection for post-editing rule-based machine translation [A]. Proceedings of the AMTA [C]. WPTP2.
［118］Vedantam, R., Lawrence Z. C. & D. Parikh. 2015. Cider: Consensus-based image description evaluation [A]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [C]. 4566-4574.
［119］Vilar, D., Xu, J., d'Haro, L. F. & H. Ney. 2006. Error analysis of statistical machine translation output [A]. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference[C]. The European Language Resources Association. 697-702.
［120］Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S., et al. 2015. Show and tell: A neural image caption generator [A]. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition [C]. IEEE. 3156-3164.
［121］Wang, W. Q. 2007. Corpus-driven study of translation units in an EnglishChinese parallel corpus [A]. Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2007) [C]. University of Birmingham.
［122］Wisniewski, G., Singh, A. K. & F. Yvon. 2013. Quality estimation for machine translation: Some lessons learned [J]. Machine Translation, 27(3-4): 213-238.
［123］Xiong, D., Zhang, M. & H. Li. 2010. Error detection for statistical machine translation using linguistic features [A]. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 604-611.
［124］Xue, N., Bojar, O., Hajic, J., et al. 2014. Not an interlingua, but close: comparison of English AMRs to Chinese and Czech [A]. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference [C]. The European Language Resources Association. 1765-1772.
［125］Ye, Y., Zhou, M. & C. Y. Lin. 2007. Sentence level machine translation evaluation as a ranking problem: one step aside from BLEU [A]. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation [C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 240-247.
［126］Yu, S. W. 1991. Automatic evaluation of output quality for machine translation systems [A]. In Falkedal, K. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Evaluators' Forum [C]. Switzerland: Les Rasses.
［127］Zaidan, O. F. & C. Callison-Burch. 2011. Crowdsourcing translation: professional quality from non-professionals [A]. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies[C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1220-1229.
［128］Zeman, D., Fishel, M., Berka, J. & O. Bojar. 2011. Addicter: what is wrong with my translations? [J]. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 96: 79-88.
［129］Zhang, Y. & B. Wallace. 2015. A sensitivity analysis of (and practitioners' guide to) convolutional neural networks for sentence classification [J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1510.03820.
［130］Zhou, M., Wang, B., Liu, S., et al. 2008. Diagnostic evaluation of machine translation systems using automatically constructed linguistic checkpoints [A]. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics[C]. Association for Computational Linguistics. 1121-1128.
［131］江进林．2010．中国学习者汉译英机助评分模型的构建［D］．北京外国语大学博士论文．
［132］秦颖．2015．翻译质量自动评价研究综述［J］．计算机应用研究（2）：326-329．
［133］曲维光、周俊生、吴晓东等．2017．自然语言句子抽象语义表示AMR研究综述［J］．数据采集与处理（1）：26-36．
［134］司显柱．2004．论功能语言学视角的翻译质量评估模式研究［J］．外语教学（4）：45-50．
［135］王金铨．2008．中国学习者汉译英机助评分模型的构建［D］．北京外国语大学博士论文．
［136］宗成庆，张霄军译．2012．统计机器翻译．北京：电子工业出版社．