参考文献

ALMOR A. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus：The informational load hypothesis [J]. Psychological Review, 1998, 106：748-765.

ANDERSON J E, HOLCOMB P J. An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy [J]. Brain and Language, 2005, 94：200-216.

ARIEL M. Referring and accessibility [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1988, 24：65-87.

ARIEL M. Accessing noun-phrase antecedent [M]. London：Routledge, 1990.

ARIEL M. Interpreting anaphoric expressions：A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1994, 30：3-42.

BAKER C L. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English [J]. Language, 1995, 71（1）：63-101.

BARRETT S E, RUGG M D, PERRETT D I. Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces [J]. Neuropsychologia, 1988, 26（1）：105-117.

BENTIN S, ALLISON T, PUCE A, et al. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1996, 8：551-565.

BENTIN S, MOUCHETANT-ROSTAING Y, GIARD M, et al. ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels：time course and scalp distribution [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999, 11：235-260.

BENTIN S, MC CARTHY G, WOOD C C. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming [J]. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1985, 60（4）：343-355.

BROWN C, HAGOORT P. The processing nature of the N400：Evidence from masked priming [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1993, 5（1）：34-44.

BURKHARDT P. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms：Evidence from

event-related brain potentials[J].Brain and Language，2006，98：159－168.

CARTER D. Interpreting Anaphora in Natural Language Texts [M]. Chichester：Ellis Horwood, 1987.

CALLAHAN S M. Processing anaphoric constructions：Insights from electrophysiological studies [J]. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2008, 21：231-266.

CHEN P. The reflexive ziji in Chinese：Funtional vs. formalist approaches [M]//LEE T H. Research in Chinese linguistics in Hong Kong. Hong Kong：The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong, 1992：1-36.

CHENG G. Variants and invariants in language [D]. Shanghai：Fudan University, 1995.

CHOMSKY N. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht, the Netherlands：Foris Publishers, 1981.

CHOMSKY N. Barriers [M]. Cambridge：MIT Press, 1986.

CHOMSKY N. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge：MIT Press, 1995.

CLARK H H, SENGUL C J. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns [J]. Memory and Cognition, 1979, 7：35-41.

CLEMENTS G N. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe：Its role in discourse [J]. Journal of West African Languages, 1975, 10：141-177.

COLES M G H, GRATTON G, FABIANI M. Event-related brain potentials [M]//CACIOPPO J T, TASSINARY L G. Principles of Psychophysiology：Physical, Social, and Inferential Elements. New York：Cambridge University Press, 1990：413-455.

COLE E, WANG C C. Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives：The case of Chinese ziji [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1996, 27：357-390.

CORBETT A T, CHANG F R. Pronoun disambiguation：Accessing potential antecedents [J]. Memory and Cognition, 1983, 11：283-294.

COULSON S, KING J W, KUTAS M. Expect the unexpected：Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1998, 13（1）, 21-58.

COMERCHERO M D, POLICH J. P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality [J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 1998, 7：41-48.

COMERCHERO M D, POLICH J. P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 1999, 110（1）：24-30.

CRYSTAL D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonology [M]. 2 nd ed. Oxford：Blackwell, 1997.

DILLON B, CHOW W Y, GUO T, et al. The structure sensitivity of memory access：Evidence from mandarin Chinese [J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2014, 5：1-16.

DONCHIN E, COLES M. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating？ [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998, 11：357-374.

DWIVEDI V D, PHILLIPS N A, LAGNE-BEAUVAIS M, et al. An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora [J]. Brain Research, 2006, 1117：135-153.

EGGINS S. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. London：Pinter, 1994.

FAMRER A K, HANRISH R M. Communicative reference with pronouns [M]. // VERSCHUEREN J, BERTCUCCELLI-PAPI M. The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam：Benjamins, 1987：547-565.

FIRTH J R. Papers in Linguistics [M]. London：Oxford University Press, 1957.

FRANK A, KAMP H. On context dependence in modal constructions：Proceedings of SALT, March 21-23, 1997 [C]. Stanford（CLC Publications and Cornell University）, 2007.

FRAZIER L, RAYNER K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension：Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentence [J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14：178-210.

FRIEDERICI A D, HAHNE A, SADDY D. Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2002, 31（1）：45-63.

FRIEDERICI A D, STEINHAUER K, MECKLINGER A, et al. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses [J]. Biological Psychology, 1998, 47：193-221.

FRIEDERICI A D, MECKLINGER A. Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses：First-pass and second-pass parsing processes [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1996, 25（1）：157-176.

FRIEDERICI A D, MECKLINGER A, SPENCER K M. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions：A spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials [J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2001, 11：305-323.

GARROD S C, Sanford A J. Resolving sentences in discourse context：How discourse representation affects language understanding [M]. // GERNSBACHER M A. Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York：Academic Press, 1994：675-698.

GERNSBACHER M, HARGREAVES D. Accessing sentence participants：the advantage of first mention [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988, 27：699-717.

GIORGI A. From temporal anchoring to long distance anaphors [J]. Natural Language&Linguistic Theory, 2006, 24（4）：1009-1047.

GIORGI A，On the nature of long-distance anaphors[J].Linguistic Inquiry，2007，38（2）：321－342.

GIORGI A, PIANESI F. Tense and aspect：From semantics to morphosyntax [M]. New York：Oxford University Press, 1997.

GIORGI A, PIANESI F. Tense, attitudes and subjects [C]. // HASTINGS R, JACKSON B, ZVOLENSZKY Z. Proceedings of SALT XI, Ithaca：CLC Publications, 2001.

GIORGI A, PIANESI F. The temporal perspective of the speaker and the subject：From semantics to morphosyntax [M]. // GUERON, LECARME J. The Syntax of Time. Cambridge：MIT Press, 2004a：129-152.

GIORGI A, PIANESI F. Complementizer deletion in Italian [M]. // RIZZI L. The Structure of CP and IP. New York：Oxford University Press, 2004b：190-210.

GIVON T. Topic Continuity in Discourse [M]. Amsterdam：John Benjamins, 1983, 343-364.

GRICE P. Logic and conversation [M]. // COLE P, MORGAN J. Syntax and Semantics 3：Speech Arts. New York：Academic Press, 1975, 41-58.

GORDON P C, HENDRICK R. The representation and processing of co-reference in discourse [J]. Cognitive Science, 1998, 22：389-424.

HALLIDAY M A K, HASAN R. Cohesion in English [M]. London：Longman, 1976.

HALLIDAY M A K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. 2nd ed. London：Edward Arnold, 1994.

HARRIS T, WEXLER K, HOLCOMB P. An ERP investigation of binding and coreference [J]. Brain and Language, 2000, 75：313-346.

HAIMAN J, THOMPSON S A. Clause Combination in Grammar and Discourse [M]. Amsterdam：John Benjamins, 1988.

HAGOORT P, BROWN C, GROOTHUSEN J. The syntactic positive shift（SPS）as an ERP measure of syntactic processing [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1993, 8（4）：439-483.

HAGOORT P. How the brain solves the binding problem for language：a neurocomputational model of syntactic processing [J]. Neuro Image, 2003, 20：18-29.

HAGOORT P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension：ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2003, 15（6）：883-899.

HAMMER A, JANSMA B M, LAMER M, et al. Pronominal reference in sentences about person and things：An electrophysiological approach [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2005, 17（2）：227-239.

HAMMER A, JANSMA B M, LAMER M, et al. Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs [J]. Brain Research. 2008, 16：177-191.

HAMMER A, JANSMA B M, TEMPELMANN C, et al. Neural mechanisms of anaphoric reference revealed by fMRI [J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2011, 2.

HASAN R. Text in the systemic-functional model [M]. // DRESSLER W U. Current Trends in Text Linguistics, Berlin/New York：Walter de Gruyter, 1978：228-246.

HEINE A, TAMM S, HOFMANN M, et al. Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors？An ERP study [J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2006, 400：7-12.

HELLAN L. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar [M]. Dordrecht：Foris Publications, 1988.

HELLAN L. Containment and connectedness anaphors [M]. // KOSTER J, REULAND E. Long-distance Anaphora, Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1991：27-48.

HOLCOMB P J, NEVILLE H J. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision：A comparison using event-related brain potentials [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1990, 5（4）.

HOLCOMB P J, NEVILLE H J. Natural speech processing：An analysis using event-related brain potentials [J]. Psychobiology, 1991, 19（4）：286-300.

HOLCOMB P J, MCPHERSON W B. Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain and Cognition, 1994, 24（2）：259-276.

HUANG Y. Reflexives in Chinese [J]. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 1984, 10：163-188.

HUANG Y. A neo-Gricean Pragmatic theory of anaphora [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1991, 27：301-335.

HUANG Y. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora：A Study with Special Reference to Chinese [M]. New York：Cambridge University Press, 1994.

HUANG C_T J. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar [D]. Cambridge, MA：Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1982.

HUANG C_T J, Tang C_C J. The local nature of long-distance reflexive in Chinese [M]. // KOSTER J, REULAND E. Long distance Anaphora. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1991.

HUANG C_T J, HUANG Y_H, TENG T_H. Reflexives in Chinese and the teaching of Chinese [C]. Proceedings of the First World Conference on Chinese Language, 1984：205-215.

HUANG C_T J, LIU C_S U. Logophoricity, Attitudes, and ziji at the interface [M]//COLE P C_T, HUANG J, HERMON G. Long-distance Reflexives, Vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics. New York：Academic Press, 2001：141-195.

IIDA M. Context and Binding in Japanese [D]. Stanford, CA：Stanford University, 1992.

JIANG X, ZHOU X. Processing different levels of syntactic hierarchy：An ERP study on Chinese [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2009, 47：1282–1293.

KAAN E, HARRIS A, GIBSON E, et al. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2000, 15（2）：159-201.

KIM A, SIKOS L. Conflict and surrender during sentence processing：An ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction [J]. Brain and Language, 2011, 118（1-2）：15-22.

KOSTER J, REULAND E. Long Distance Anaphora [M]. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1991.

KOORNNEEF A W. Eye-Catching Anaphora [EB/OL]. （2013-12-12） [2008-08-27]. // http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2008-0827-200436/UUindex.html

KRAHMER E, PIWEK P. Varieties of anaphora：Introduction [C]. // KRAHMER E, PIWEK P. Varieties of Anaphora：Proceedings of Reader ESSLLI 2000, Birmingham, 2000.

KRAHMER E, VAN DEEMER K. On the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases：Towards a full understanding of partial matches [J]. Journal of Semantics, 1998, 15（3-4）：355-392.

KUTAS M, HILLYARD S A. Reading senseless sentences：Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruency [J]. Science, 1980, 207：203-205.

KUTAS M, HILLYARD S A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association [J]. Nature, 1984, 307：161-163.

KUTAS M, VAN PETTEN C. Event-related brain potential studies of language [M]. // ACKLES P K, JENNINGS J R, COLES M G H. Advances in Psychophysiology, Greenwich, CT：JAI Press Inc, 1988, 3：139-187.

KUTAS M, FEDERMEIER K D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2000, 4（12）：463-470.

KUNO S. Functional Syntax：Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy [M]. Chicago：University of Chicago Press, 1987.

KUNO S. Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1972, 3：161-195.

LAMB S M. Paths of the Brain：The Neurocognitive Basis of Language [M]. Amsterdam：John Benjamins, 1999.

LANGACKER R W. Pronominalization and the chain of command [M]. // REIBEL D A, SCHANE S A. Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall：Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1969：160-186.

LANGACKER R W. Foundation of Cognitive Grammar 2：Descriptive Application [M]Stanford：Stanford University Press, 1991.

LARSON R, SEGAL G. Knowledge of meaning [M], Cambridge, MA：MIT Press, 1995.

LEBEAUX D. A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1983, 14：723-730.

LEE R B, KLIMA E S. Rules for English Pronominalization [J]. Language, 1963, 39：17-28.

LEVINSON S C. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora：A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomenon [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1987, 23：379-434.

LEVINSON S C. Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Conditions revisited [J]. Journal of Linguistics, 1991, 27：1, 107-161.

LI N-C. Perspective-Taking in Mandarin Discourse [D]. Buffalo, N. Y. ：State University of New York at Buffalo, 1991.

LI X Q, ZHOU X L. Who is ziji？ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension [J]. Brain research, 2010, 1331：96-104.

LIN J-W. Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese [J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2003, 12：259–311.

LUCK S J. An Introduction to the Event-related Potential Technique [M]. Cambridge：Massachusetts, 2005.

MANZINI M R, WEXLER K. Parameters, binding theory, and learnability [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1987, 18：413-444.

MARWLEN-WILSON W. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process [J]. Science, 1975, 189：226-228.

MARTIN J R. English Text：System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia：Benjamins, 1992.

MATTHEWS P H. Concise Dictionary of Linguistics [M]. Oxford：Oxford University Press, 1997.

MAURER U, BREM S, BUCHER K, et al. Emerging neurophysiological specialization for letter strings [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005, 17：1532-1552.

MCCANDLISS B D, COHEN L, DEHAENE S. The visual word form area：Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7：293-299.

MCDONALD J L, MACWHINNEY B. The time course of anaphor resolution：effects of implicit verb causality and gender [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1995, 34：543–566.

MCKOON G, GREENE S B, RATCLIFF R. Discourse Models, Pronoun Resolution and the Implicit Causality of Verbs [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1993, 19：1040-1052.

MEYER D E, SCHVANEVELDT R W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words：Evidence of dependence between retrieval operations [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 90：227-234.

MILLIS K K, JUST M A. The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1994, 33：128-147.

MOHANAN K P. Grammatical relations and anaphora in Malayalam [J]. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 1982, 5：163-190.

MOLINARO N，KIM A，VERSPIGNANI F，JOB R[J].Anaphoric agreement violation：an ERP analysis of its interpretation[J].Cognition，2008，106：963－974.

MUNTE I F, HEINZE H J, MATZKE M, et al. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited：no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift [J]. Neuropsychologia, 1998, 36（3）：217-226.

NEELY J H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition：A selective review of current findings and theories [J]. Basic Processes in Reading, 1991, 11：264-336. NICOL J L. Processing syntactic dependencies：task-specific effects [C]. Poster Presentation at the Sixth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, 1993.

NICOL J L, PICKERING M J. Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences：evidence from semantic priming [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1993, 22（2）：207-237.

NICOL J L, SWINNEY D. The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1989, 18（1）：5-19.

NICOL J L, SWINNEY D. The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora [M]. // ANDREW B. Anaphora：A Reference Guide, England：Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003：72-104.

NIEUWLAND M S, VAN BERKUMJ J A. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution：Evidence from ERPs [J]. Brain Research, 2006, 1118（1）：155-167.

NIEUWLAND M S, OTTEN M, VAN BERKUM J J A. Who are you talking about？Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related potentials [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2007, 19：228-236.

NIEUWLAND M S, VAN BERKUM J J A. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution：Evidence from ERPs [J]. Brain and Language, 2008, 106：119-131.

OSTERHOUT L, MOBLEY L A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1995, 34（6）：739-773.

OSTERHOUT L, BERSICK M, MCLAUGHLIN J. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes [J]. Memory and Cognition, 1997, 25（3）：273-285.

OSTERHOUT L，On the brain responses to syntactic anomalies：Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences[J].Brain and Language，1997，59（3）：494－522.

OSTERHOUT L, HOLCOMB P J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 1992, 31：785-806.

OSTERHOUT L, HOLCOMB P J. Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly：Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1993, 8：413-438.

PAN H H. Locality, Self_Ascription, Discourse Prominence, and Mandarin Reflexives [D]. Austin, TX：The University of Texas at Austin, 1995.

PAN H H. Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese [M]. New York：Garland Publishing, Inc, 1997.

PAN H H. Why the Blocking Effect [M]？//PETER C, HUANG C T J, GABRIELLE H. Long-distance Reflexives, Vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics, New York：Academic Press, 2001：279-316.

PARTEE B. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English [J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1973, 70：601-609.

PICA P. Subject, tense and truth：Towards a modular approach to binding [J]. Foris, 1985.

PICA P. On the nature of reflexivization cycle [C]. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, 1987, 17：483-499.

POLICH J. Updating P300：An integrative theory of P3a and P3b [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2007, 118（10）：2128-2148.

POLICH J, DONCHIN E. The P300 and the word frequency effect [J]. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1998, 70：33-45.

POLLARD C J, SAG I A. Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1992, 23：261-303.

POLLARD C J, XUE P. Syntactic and non-syntactic constraints on long-distance binding [M]. // PETER C, HUANG C T J, GABRIELLE H. Long-distance Reflexives, vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics, New York：Academic Press, 2001：317-342.

PROGOVAC L. Relativized subject, long-distance reflexives, and accessibility [D]. Bloomington：Indiana University, 1991.

PROGOVAC L. Relativized subject, Long-distance reflexives without movement [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1992, 23：671-680.

PROGOVAC L, FRANKS, S. Relativized subjects for reflexives [C]. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Societ, 1992, 22：349-363.

PULVERMULLER F, SHTYROV Y. Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity [J]. Neuroimage, 2003, 20（1）：159-172.

PULVERMULLER F, SHTYROV Y. Language outsides the focus of attention：The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes [J]. Progress in Neurobiology, 2006, 79（1）, 49-71.

PYNTE J, COLONNA S. Decoupling syntactic parsing from visual inspection：The case of relative clause attachment in French [M]. // KENNEDY A, RADACH D, HELLER D, J. PYNTE J. Reading as a Perceptual Process, Oxford：Elsevier, 2000：529-547.

RINCK M, BOWER G H. Anaphora Resolution and the Focus of Attention in Situation Models [J], Journal of Memory and Language, 1995, 34：110-131.

REINHART T. Anaphora [M]. // KEIL W. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge, MA：MIT Press, 1999：20-22.

REINHART T, RRULAND E. Reflexivity [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1993, 24（4）：657-720.

REINHART T, RRULAND E. Anaphors and logophors：An argument structure perspective [M]. // KOSTER J, REULAND E. Long distance Anaphora. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1991.

RUGG M D. The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials [J]. Psychophysiology, 1985, 22（6）：642-647.

SCHMITT B M, LAMER M, MUNTE T F. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing [J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2002, 14：333-346.

SELLS P. Aspects of logophoricity [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1987, l8：445-479.

SEMLITSCH H V, ANDERER P, SCHUSTER P, et al. A Solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP [J]. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23（6）：695-703.

SERENO S C, RAYNER K, POSNER M I. Establishing a time-line of word recognition：Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials [J], Neuroreport, 1998, 9（10）：2195-2200.

SIMON G, PETIT L, BEMARD C, et al. N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition [J]. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2007, 3（1）：21.

STREB J, ROSLER F, HENNIGHAUSEN E. Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures [J]. Brain and Language, 1999, 70：273-286.

STREB J, HENNIGHAUSEN E, ROSLER F. Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by event-related brain potentials [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2004, 33（3）：175-201.

STRAYER D L, KRAMER A F. Attentional requirements of automatic and controlled processing [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990, 16：67-82.

SWAAB T Y, CAMBLIN C C, GORDON P C. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004, 16（5）：715-726.

SWINNEY D A. Lexical access during sentence comprehension：（Re）consideration of context effects [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 15：661-689.

TANAKA J W, CURRAN T. A neural basis for expert object recognition [J]. Psychological Science, 2001, 12（1）：43-47.

TANENHAUS M, LEIMAN J, SEIDENBERG M. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 18：427-441.

TANG C_C J. Chinese reflexives [J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1989, 7：93-121.

TANG C_C J. A Study of Reflexives in Chinese [D]. Taiwan：National Taiwan Normal University, 1985.

UNGERER F, SCHMID H J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Harlow：Longman, 1996.

VAN BERKUM J J A, KOORNNEEF A W, OTTEN M, et al. Establishing reference in language comprehension：An electrophysiological perspective [J]. Brain Research, 2007, 1146：158-171.

VAN DER SANDT R. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution [J]. Journal of Semantics, 1992, 9：333-377.

VAN LEUSEN N. The role of inference in the Resolution of Correstions [C], Saarbruchen：CLAUS-Report 93, 1997.

VAN PETTEN C, KUTAS M. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-and closed-class words [J]. Memory and Cognition, 1991, 19：95-112.

VERLEGER R. Event-related potentials and cognition：A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1988, 11（3）：343-356.

XUE P, Pollard C, SAG I. A new perspective on Chinese ziji [C]. Proceedings of the 13 th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Chicago：The University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publication, 1994, 432-447.

XU L J. The long-distance binding of ziji [J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1993, 21：123-141.

XU L J. The antecedent of ziji [J]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1994, 22：115-137.

YANG D W. The extended binding theory of anaphors [J]. Language Research, 1983, 19：169-192.

YE Z, ZHOU X. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension：Evidence from ERPs [J]. Brain Research, 2008, 1203：103-115.

YU W. Logophoricity in Chinese [C]. Paper presented at the 3 rd North-American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1991.

ZRIBI-HERTZ A. Review of Y. Huang, The syntax and Pragmatics of anaphora：A study with special reference to Chinese [J]. Lingua, 1995, 96：179-211.

常欣. 认知神经语言学视野下的句子理解[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2009.

许余龙. 英汉指称词语表达的可及性[J]. 外语教学与研究，2000（5）：321－328.

许余龙. 篇章回指的功能语用探索：一项基于汉语民间故事和报刊语料的研究[M]. 上海：上海外语教育出版社，2004.

高原. 照应词的认知分析[M]. 北京：外语教学与研究出版，2003.

赵鸣，刘涛. 语言回指加工的ERP研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展，2011，19：355－363.

程琪龙. 概念框架和认知[M]. 上海：上海外语教育出版社，2006.

姜望琪. 篇章与回指[J]. 外语学刊，2006：33－40.

胡壮磷. 语言学教程[M]. 北京：北京大学出版社，2001.

胡壮磷，朱永生，张德禄，李战子. 系统功能语言学概论（修订版）[M]. 北京：北京大学出版社，2008.

金忠镐. 略谈动词对“自己”长距离约束的制约作用[J]. 汉语学习，2003（4）.

赵仑.ERPs实验教程[M]. 南京：东南大学出版社，2010.

程工. 汉语“自己”一词的代词性[J]. 现代外语，1994（3）.

程工. 生成语法对汉语“自己”一词的研究[J]. 当代语言学，1994（1）.

高立群，刘兆静，黄月圆.“自己”是谁？——对约束原则的实验研究[J]. 语言科学，2005，（2）：39－50.

胡建华. 空指代的控制与“自己”的释义——论英、汉语之间的一些参数差异[J]. 现代外语，1995（4）.

胡建华. 约束、述谓与特征核查——最简方案框架内的反身代词化研究[J]. 外国语（上海外国语大学学报），1998（5）.

胡建华. 汉语长距离反身代词化的句法研究[J]. 当代语言学，1998（3）：33－40.

胡建华，潘海华. NP显著性的计算与汉语反身代词“自己”的指称[J]. 当代语言学，2002（1）：46－60.

刘道英. 从管辖约束理论看汉语人称指涉关系[J]. 青海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版），1999（3）.

刘兆静. 约束原则与汉语反身代词的习得研究[J]. 北京：北京语言大学，2009.

胡承校. 现代汉语中“自己”用法说略[J]. 淮北煤炭师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版），2005（3）.

邱舟艳. “自己”——约束原则A的叛逆者[J]. 山东外语教学，2001（4）.

张宁. 英汉照应语反身代词的约束对比[J]. 南京晓庄学院学报，2002（2）.

仰鑫. 约束理论与汉语中的反身代词[D]. 安徽：安徽师范大学，2003.

李京廉. 现代汉语中长距离反身代词“自己”的阻断效应研究[J]. 外国语言文学，2004（1）.

那洪伟. 英汉照应语反身代词的对比分析[J]. 吉林华侨外国语学院学报，2006.

叶素贞. 最简方案框架下的汉语反身代词[J]. 考试周刊，2008（5）.