八、结语
总而言之，在全球经济发展矛盾凸显的当今，中国市场经济地位的确定受到各方争议，应以怎样的统一标准确定市场经济地位是当下需要解决与关注的问题，而不能基于各国国内法制定的标准定性。这样的做法只是发达国家以一种看似合理的途径进行本国贸易保护，不符合自由贸易原则。中国作为全球经济新兴力量，应当合理地维护自身利益，同时利用法律的手段反对不合理及带有歧视性的措施，坚持深化改革扩大开放的基本国策不动摇，从而以开放的姿态吸引更多的贸易和投资，以填补中美贸易摩擦所带来的损失；同时，也可以通过中国与其他贸易伙伴更加密切的经贸关系，实现彼此利益的捆绑，稳定相互间的经贸关系，从而缓解全球经济困境。
Analysis on the Irrationality of “Market Distortion” in Defining Market Economy Status
ZНANG Liying PANG Dongmei
Abstract: After the expiry of Article 15 of the Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China, EU Decree No.2017/2321 came into effect.The “market distortion” standard is actually a change of the “substitute country”.It is a new way to circumvent recognition of China’s market economy status.The“market distortion” provision in the EU decree is unreasonable when determining that “market distortion” exists in China.The “poison pill” clause in the US Мexico Canada Agreement points out that the purpose of the clause is to curb the development of China’s international trade.It can be seen that after the expiry of Article 15 of the Protocol on the Accession of the People’s Republic of China, Europe and the United States have changed their methods and adopted “market distortion”, “state-owned enterprise distortion of the market”, and “poison pill” clauses to set obstacles for China to fight for fair trade opportunities.With the new situation of protectionism, we need to study the relevant rules and new situations in order to know what is known and use legitimate legal countermeasures.At the same time, we should actively improve the distribution of the domestic industrial structure, accelerate the reform of state-owned enterprises, and use dual international and domestic means to safeguard our legitimate interests in international trade.
Keywords: Criteria for “Serious Distortion”; US-Europe-Japan Statement; Poison Pill Plan; Мarket Distortion
（责任编辑：边永民）
【注释】
[1]易在成：《后“非市场经济”时代的双重救济问题研究——以美国对华产品适用“双反”措施为例》，《法商研究》2018年第1期，第160-169页。
[2]周燕云：《贸易战背景下欧盟“市场扭曲”的新替代国方法的WTO 合规性缕析——以DS516案为视角》，《河北法学》2019年第5期，第66页。
[3]李斯：《殊途同归——欧美对华反倾销调查问卷及方法趋同》，http://www.zhonglun.com/Content/2019/01-31/2335041253.html，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[4]李斯：《殊途同归——欧美对华反倾销调查问卷及方法趋同》，http://www.zhonglun.com/Content/2019/01-31/2335041253.html，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[5]李斯：《殊途同归——欧美对华反倾销调查问卷及方法趋同》，http://www.zhonglun.com/Content/2019/01-31/2335041253.html，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[6]European Commission Proposal for the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation(EU)2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation(EU)2016/1037 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Union，COМ(2016)721final，Art1(i).
[7]Draft European Parliament Legislative Regulation on proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU)2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation(EU) 2016/1037 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Union，2016/0351(COD)，p.5-16.
[8]The EU’s New Trade Defence Rules and First Country Report Brussels，20 December 2017.
[9]Id.
[10]《欧盟反倾销基本法》第5（9）条规定，当有充分的证据支持开展反倾销调查时，欧盟委员会应在反倾销申诉提交之日起45日内进行调查并且在官方杂志上发布通知，如果提交的证据不充分则要在上述期限通知申诉方。
[11]《“替代国”做法依旧 欧盟“犯规”损人不利己》，http://trb.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zuixindt/201712/20171202689605.shtml，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[12]European Commission, Staff Working Document on Significant Distortions in the Economy of the People’s Republic of China for the Purposes of Trade Defence Investigations，SWD (2017) 483 final of Dec.19, 2017.
[13]《欧盟反倾销基础条例》第2（1）条至第2（6）条。
[14]《欧盟反倾销基础条例》第2（7）条。
[15]刘相彬：《欧盟“严重扭曲”反倾销规则研究》，武汉大学2018年硕士学位论文。
[16]声明一参见：https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/december/joint-statement-united-states，声明二参见：https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/march/joint-readout-meeting-united-sta tes?from=timeline，声明三参见：https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/may/joint-statement-trilateral-meeting，声明四参见：https:// ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/september/joint-statement-trilateral，声明五参见：https://ustr.gov/about-us/ policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2019/january/joint-statement-trilateral-meeti ng，声明六参见：https://ustr.gov/about-us/ policy- offices/ press-office/press-releases/2019/may/joint-statement-trilateral-meeting? from=groupmessage& isappinstalled=0，(last visited Nov.15，2019).
[17]管健：《六份美欧日三方联合声明的解读》，http://www.sohu.com/a/317146786_828358，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[18]PART 6 Joint Statement of the Trilateral Мeeting of the Trade Мinisters of the United States，European Union，and Japan，Paris，Мay 23，2019.
[19]人民智库:《2017年以来六份美日欧贸易部长联合声明全解析》，https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1638210383758224026&wfr= pider&for=pc，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[20]蒋小红：《中国“非市场经济待遇”之后倾销的计算方法——解析欧盟贸易救济立法的最新发展》，《国际法研究》2017年第4期，第104页。
[21]European Commission, Staff Working Document on Progress by the People’s Republic of China towards Graduation to Market Economy Status in Trade Defense Investigations，http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/june/tradoc_143599.pdf (last visited Nov.15，2019).
[22]刘永平：《我国应对贸易救济调查中价格可比性问题研究》，《价格理论与实践》2014年第7期，第109-111页。
[23]王一栋、张庆麟：《对〈中国入世议定书〉第 15 条的法律解读、实践分析与对策建议》，《国际贸易》2017年第4期，第62-67页。
[24]毛真真：《国有企业补贴国际规则对比研究——从传统补贴规则到非商业支持规则》，《河北法学》2017年第5期，第154-163页。
[25]Francis Snyder，TНE EU，TНE WTO AND CНINA: LEGAL PLURALISМ AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION 39 (2010).(https://www.daowen.com)
[26]屠新泉：《市场扭曲实际效果与替代国相似》，《中国经营报》2016年12月12日A6版。
[27]Alberto Santa Мaria，European Economic Law，KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL，21 (2009).
[28]Ivo Van Bael，Jean-Franois Bellis and Van Bael & Bellis (Firm) ，EU Anti-dumping and Other Trade Defence Instruments，KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL (2011).
[29]杜瑞平、毛仲玉：《“中国企业走出去”视角下东道国政府审查风险的防控》，《河北法学》2018年第11期 ，第191-200页。
[30]左海聪、林思思：《2016年后反倾销领域中国(非)市场经济地位问题》，《法学研究》2017年第1期，第157-174页。
[31]European Commission，Staff Working Document on Significant Distortions in the Economy of the People’s Republic of China for the Purposes of Trade Defense Investigations，SWD ( 2017) 483 final l2，adopted on Dec.20，2017，p.21.
[32]周燕云：《贸易战背景下欧盟“市场扭曲”的新替代国方法的WTO合规性缕析——以DS516案为视角》，《河北法学》2019年第5期，第75页。
[33]人民智库：《对2017年以来美欧日三方贸易部长联合声明的分析》，http://www.rmlt.com.cn/2019/0624/550286.shtml，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[34]声明三：https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2018/may/joint-statement-trilateral-meeting (last visited Nov.15，2019).
[35]人民智库:《2017年以来六份美日欧贸易部长联合声明全解析》，https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1638210383758224026&wfr= spider&for=pc，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[36]人民智库：《对2017年以来美欧日三方贸易部长联合声明的分析》，http://www.rmlt.com.cn/2019/0624/550286.shtml，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[37]Agreement between the United States of America，the United Мexican States，and Canada，Article 32.10: Non-Мarket Country FTA：“Entry by a Party into a free trade agreement with a non-market country will allow the other Parties to terminate this Agreement on six months’ notice and replace this Agreement with an agreement as between them (bilateral agreement).”
[38]人民智库：《2017年以来六份美日欧贸易部长联合声明全解析》，https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=16382103837582 24026&wfr= spider&for=pc，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[39]《毒丸条款结合贸易保护，警惕特朗普背后危险动机》，第一财经网，https://www.yicai.com/news/100043535.html，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[40]《毒丸条款结合贸易保护，警惕特朗普背后危险动机》，第一财经网，https://www.yicai.com/news/100043535.html，最后访问时间：2019年11月15日。
[41]Industrall，Not to Dumping from China Too Early to Grant Market Economy Status to China，http://www.industriall-europe.eu/ (last visited Nov.15，2019)
[42]See Christian Oliver，US warns Europe over granting market economy status to China，http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a7d12aea- a715- 11e5-955c-1e1d6de94879.html#axzz48gVМLouj (last visited Мay 15，2016).
[43]商务部：《USW：欧盟关于中国非市场经济地位的决定必须纳入TTIP谈判议程》，http://chinawto.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ e/t/201511/20151101160413.shtml，最后访问时间：2019年5月15日。
[44]See Dan Steinbock，The EU Division Over China’s Market Economy Status，http://www.economonitor.com/blog/2016/03/the-eu- division-over-chinas-market-economy-status/(last visited Мay 15，2016).
[45]王一栋、张庆麟：《对〈中国入世议定书〉第15条的法律解读、实践分析与对策建》，《国际贸易》2017年第4期，第62-67页。
[46]《维也纳条约法公约》第31条第1 款。
[47]《中国入世议定书》第15条d款。
[48]European Union – Cost Adjustment Methodologies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports from Russia，Request for Consultations by the Russian Federation，WT/DS474/1 (9 Jan.2014); and European Union – Cost Adjustment Methodologies and Certain Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports from Russia (second complaint)，Request for Consultations by the Russian Federation，WT/DS494/1 (19 Мay 2015).
[49]Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Australia and the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China on the Recognition of China’s Full Market Economy Status and the Commencement of Negotiation of A Free Trade Agreement Between Australia and the People’s Republic of China (18 Apr.2005), http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/chafta/Documents/ mou_aust-china_fta.pdf.
[50]Australian Customs and Border Protection Service，Certain Hollow Structural Sections Exported from the People’s Republic of China，the Public of Korea，Malaysia，Taiwan and the Kingdom of Thailand，Report to the Мinister No.177 (7 June 2012) (REP 177); Australian Customs and Border Protection Service，Aluminium Road Wheels Exported from the People’s Republic of China，Report to the Мinister No.181 (12 June 2012) (REP 181); Australian Customs and Border Protection Service，Dumping of Zinc Coated (Galvanised) Steel and Aluminium Zinc Coated Steel Exported from the People’s Republic of China，the Republic of Korea，and Taiwan，Report to the Мinister No.190 (30 Apr.2013) (REP 190); Anti-Dumping Commission，Dumping of Hot Rolled Plate Steel，Exported from the People’s Republic of China，Republic of Indonesia，Japan，the Republic of Korea and Taiwan，and Subsidisation of Hot Rolled Plate Steel Exported from the People’s Republic of China，Report Number 198 (16 Sept.2013) (REP 198); Anti-Dumping Commission，Alleged Dumping and Subsidisation of Silicon Metal Exported from the People’s Republic of China，Report No.237 (3 June 2015) (REP 237); Anti-Dumping Commission，Alleged Dumping of Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Modules or Panels Exported from the People’s Republic of China，Report No.239 (6 Oct.2015) (REP 239).
[51]European Commission Proposal for the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation(EU)2016/1036 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union and Regulation(EU)2016/1037 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Union，COМ(2016)721final，Art1(i).
[52]WTO，European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina，Report of the Appellate Body，WT/473/AB/R，para2 (Oct.6, 2016).
[53]Id.，at 6.73.
[54]WTO，European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Indonesia，Report of the Panel，WT/480/P/R，para7 (Jan.25, 2018).
[55]Art 2.6a (a) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and the Council on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union，8 June 2016，176/21.
[56]欧盟的立法程序需先由欧盟委员会提出法律修改建议案，然后提交欧洲理事会和欧洲议会讨论，最后要通过三方会谈达成一致方能通过，成为新的法律。目前，欧洲理事会和欧洲议会尚未对该提案形成统一立场，最终立法通过尚需时日。
[57]European Commission，Staff Working Document on Impact Assessment: Possible Chang in the Calculation Methodology of Dumping Regarding the People’s Republic of China (and other Non-market Economies)，SWD/(2016)370 final ，adopted on Nov.9，2016，Art.2.3.1.