3.5 From Industrial Heritage Conservation to the D...
3.5.1 Comprehensive Survey of Present Situations/Conditions
The cultural industry is a new industry that has developed rapidly in recent years.This research focuses on how to address industrial heritage within the domain of cultural industry towards achieving a more sustainable design.It selected eight cities for a field survey(Beijing,Shanghai,Guangzhou,Tianjin,Chongqing,Qingdao,Xi'an and Fuzhou),and established a database of 190 cases.It also investigated and analyzed some key cases in a number of cities including Beijing,Tianjin,Qingdao,Shanghai,Wuhan,Xi'an and Guangzhou.（Zhong Dandan,2016）
3.5.2 Motivation Analysis of Regenerated Industrial Heritage as a Form of Cultural Industry
There are mainly three types of development promotion available for industrial heritage reused as a form of cultural industry in China:the allocation of land use rights,transformation and upgrading of traditional industry,and market discipline.This research explains the influence of the allocation of land use rights using case studies from Beijing and Shanghai,and resorts to the“Shanghai-Qingdao-Tianjin”pattern found in the Chinese textile industry to interpret the influences derived from the transformation and upgrading of traditional industries.It also explains the influences of market discipline in the case study of Qingdao.(Zhong Dandan,2016)(https://www.daowen.com)
3.5.3 Main Points Regarding the Development Modes of Regeneration：From Industrial Heritage to Cultural Industry
Because the modes of development and the functioning of institutions in China are different from those of Western countries,this research project,in its ultimate conclusion,takes into consideration the development modes of Chinese industrial heritage as a cultural industry with concern to the particular context of China.These modes are basically driven by universities,promotion initiatives by government bodies and property developers,and companies engaged in cultural industry activities,and each mode was analyzed.
Based on these distinctions in value preferences,and the role played by dominant institutions,the actual performance and predominance of the values of transformation/heritage differ as a result.For example,in terms of regeneration projects led by the government,they are mainly dominated by reconversion as museums and landscape parks,which become a part of the urban infrastructure for public service.In contrast,the value of heritage could be better embodied through closer cooperation between the government and academic research teams.In such cases,it can be said that the value of the transformation of use is not usually as well developed as a business development approach.Additionally,projects led by property developers always involve high degrees of transformation,but also less accurate interpretations of heritage value,which require the participation of an academic research team to guarantee their success.(Zhong Dandan,2016)Moreover,the research team selected the Tianjin Third Cotton Textile Factory as a case study,and interpreted different development modes in the same project to showcase the flexibility of its current development mode.(Qiu Shuang,Zuo Jin and Huang Jingtao,2014)Based on the above research and achievements of the field survey,policy suggestions can be put forward.